Volume 32, Issue 120 (October 2019)                   IJN 2019, 32(120): 50-59 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taleghani N, Mardani Hamooleh M, Seyedfatemi N, Haghani H. Viewpoints of Nurses toward Prosocial Tendencies at the Teaching Hospitals Affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences. IJN 2019; 32 (120) :50-59
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3015-en.html
1- MS in Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Nursing Care Research Center, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author) Tel: 09132864077 Email: mardanihamoole.m@iums.ac.ir
3- Professor, Nursing Care Research Center, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Instructor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2975 Views)
Background & Aims: Prosocial tendencies are aimed at improving the conditions of the recipient of aids, and the motivation of the individual is not to fulfill professional obligations. On the other hand, the recipient of aid is not an organization, but rather a human. Prosocial tendencies result in psychological wellbeing in individuals, so that self-esteem would become positive, life satisfaction would increase, individuals would become socially empowered, and their empathy with the other community members would extend. In fact, these tendencies lay the basis for amicable relations with others, cause empathy and compassion toward others, and enhances the support of those in need. As a result, these tendencies lead to the social flourishing of individuals and enhance their power of moral reasoning. From a deeper perspective, it could be stated that the individuals harboring these tendencies enjoy higher social trust and ultimately have favorable psychosocial health. In contrast, those without these tendencies experience greater social anxiety and emotional exhaustion and may feel unable to help and empathize with others. Prosocial tendencies promote the professional satisfaction of employees, making them content with communicating with others, which in turn leads to kindness toward others, absence of depressive symptoms, and less occupational interrelations. Therefore, it is safe to say that it is essential for nurses to benefit from prosocial tendencies, especially when they are required to provide comprehensive patient care. Nurses need these tendencies to establish valuable and ethical relations with patients and their families, which will ultimately result in their own moral transcendence. The present study aimed to assess prosocial tendencies among nurses.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted on 200 nurses employed in four teaching hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) in 2019. The participants were selected via quota sampling. Data were collected using a demographic form to measure the variables of age, gender, marital status, education level, work experience, ward of employment, employment status, type of work shift, and interest in the nursing profession. The other tool was the scale of prosocial tendencies, which has been designed by Carlo et al. The content validity method was used to assess the validity of the tool. For this purpose, the Persian and English versions of the tool were provided to five nursing professors, and their corrective comments were applied. Moreover, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the instrument, which was estimated at 0.84 for the entire tool. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 16 using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (independent t-test and analysis of variance), and the P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of IUMS.
Results: The mean total score of the prosocial tendencies of the nurses was 88.9 ± 15.74. Among the prosocial tendencies, unknown dimensions (3.81 ± 0.88), critical dimension (3.72 ± 0.92), emotional dimension (3.72 ± 1.1), compliant dimension (3.68 ± 0.78), and altruistic tendencies (3.15 ± 0.82) had the highest to the lowest mean scores, respectively. Furthermore, no significant correlations were observed between the demographic characteristics of the nurses and prosocial tendencies.
Conclusion: According to the results, the nurses believed that helping others was the most desirable among various prosocial tendencies as long as the recipients of aid are aware of the help. This could be attributed to the nature of the nursing profession, which is essentially a populist profession, with professionals seeking to provide services to the community members, even if they are unaware of the services. In this study, the prosocial tendencies in the altruistic dimension had the lowest mean score compared to the other dimensions. Given the importance of altruism in the nursing profession and the consequences of its lack, as well as the fact that in the present study, this prosocial tendency had the lowest status from the perspective of the nurses, related interventions are critical to promote this tendency in nurses. These interventions should be based on psychological training in this area. In the present study, no significant correlations were observed between the demographic characteristics of the nurses and their prosocial tendencies. However, further investigations are required in this regard to clarify the possible associations between the demographic characteristics of the nurses and their prosocial tendencies. In addition, nursing researchers are advised to conduct studies with a qualitative approach in order to identify prosocial tendencies and analyze the factors that facilitate and threaten these tendencies. In clinical nursing, the results of this study could help nursing managers to consider care models based on prosocial tendencies in the healthcare plans for nurses, and various dimensions of these tendencies could be the building blocks of such models. The use of non-probability sampling in this study could be considered a limitation since the nature of this method makes it difficult to generalize the findings.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1015 kb]   (1207 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing
Received: 2019/07/13 | Accepted: 2019/10/15 | Published: 2019/10/15

References
1. Bailey PE, Brady B, Ebner NC, Ruffman T. Effects of age on emotion regulation, emotional empathy, and prosocial behavior. J Gerontol: Series B. 2018 Jul 17. [DOI:10.1093/geronb/gby084] [PMID]
2. Morelli SA, Knutson B, Zaki J. Neural sensitivity to personal and vicarious reward differentially relate to prosociality and well-being. Soc Cog Affect Neurosci. 2018;13(8):831-9. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsy056] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Carlo G, Basilio CD, Knight GP. The associations of biculturalism to prosocial tendencies and positive self evaluations. J Lat psychol. 2016;4(4):189-201. [DOI:10.1037/lat0000058] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Serrat EG, González-Carrasco M, Casas FA, Malo SC. Prosociality as a Form of Productive Aging: Predictors and Their Relationship With Subjective Well-Being. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018;11(6):306-15. [DOI:10.3928/19404921-20181015-01] [PMID]
5. Reich WA, Sangiorgio C, Young J. Self-Role Integration: A Person-Specific Predictor of Life Satisfaction and Prosocial Behavior. The Journal of psychology. 2019;153(6):649-66. [DOI:10.1080/00223980.2019.1590297] [PMID]
6. Fu X, Lv Y, Yang Z, Yu X, Wang R. Chinese adolescents' power distance value and prosocial behavior toward powerful people: A longitudinal study. PloS one. 2018;13(12):e0208473. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0208473] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Franzen A, Mader S, Winter F. Contagious yawning, empathy, and their relation to prosocial behavior. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018;147(12):1950-8. [DOI:10.1037/xge0000422] [PMID]
8. Freitas M, Santos AJ, Ribeiro O, Daniel JR, Rubin KH. Prosocial behavior and friendship quality as moderators of the association between anxious withdrawal and peer experiences in Portuguese young adolescents. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2783. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02783] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Lamm C, Rütgen M, Wagner IC. Imaging empathy and prosocial emotions. Neurosci lett. 2019;693:49-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.054] [PMID]
10. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M, Cassidy J. Attachment, caregiving in couple relationships, and prosocial behavior in the wider world. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;25:16-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.009] [PMID]
11. Moradi S, Van Quaquebeke N, Hunter JA. Flourishing and prosocial behaviors: A multilevel investigation of national corruption level as a moderator. PloS one. 2018;13(7):e0200062. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0200062] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Nooien A, Kajbaf MB, Foroudastan M. Prosocial Behaviorsand Altruism among Citizens of Isfahan. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2013;50(2):49-54.
13. Afghari F, Ghasemi S. The Relationship between Social Trust and Prosocial Tendencies. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2015;3(2):62-71.
14. von Dawans B, Trueg A, Kirschbaum C, Fischbacher U, Heinrichs M. Acute social and physical stress interact to influence social behavior: The role of social anxiety. PloS one. 2018;13(10):e0204665. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0204665] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Park YN, Hyun H, Jhang J. Do Emotional Laborers Help the Needy More or Less? The Mediating Role of Sympathy in the Effect of Emotional Dissonance on Prosocial Behavior. Front Psychol. 2019;10:118. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00118] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Chancellor J, Margolis S, Jacobs Bao K, Lyubomirsky S. Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion. 2018;18(4):507. [DOI:10.1037/emo0000321] [PMID]
17. Biagioli V, Prandi C, Giuliani L, Nyatanga B, Fida R. Prosocial behaviour in palliative nurses: psychometric evaluation of the prosociality scale. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(6):292-8. [DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.6.292] [PMID]
18. Feather J, McGillis Hall L, Trbovich P, Baker GR. An integrative review of nurses' prosocial behaviours contributing to work environment optimization, organizational performance and quality of care. Journal of nursing management. 2018;26(7):769-81. [DOI:10.1111/jonm.12600] [PMID]
19. Tuyen LT, Gunawan J. Behavior management in the field of nursing: A concept analysis. InNursing forum 2018 ; 53(4: 481-8. [DOI:10.1111/nuf.12275] [PMID]
20. Kim Y, Jang SJ. Nurses' organizational communication satisfaction, emotional labor, and prosocial service behavior: A cross‐sectional study. Nursing & health sciences. 2019 ;21(2):223-30. [DOI:10.1111/nhs.12586] [PMID]
21. Nesje K. Nursing students' prosocial motivation: does it predict professional commitment and involvement in the job?. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(1):115-25. [DOI:10.1111/jan.12456] [PMID]
22. Dill J, Erickson RJ, Diefendorff JM. Motivation in caring labor: Implications for the well-being and employment outcomes of nurses. Social Science & Medicine. 2016 1;167:99-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.028] [PMID]
23. Mohammadi A, Vanaki Z, Memarian R, Fallahrafie RA. Islamic and Western Ethical Values in Health Services Management: A Comparative Study. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019, 30(4):239-50. [DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12244] [PMID]
24. Slettmyr A, Schandl A, Arman M. The ambiguity of altruism in nursing: A qualitative study. Nursing ethics. 2019;26(2):368-77. [DOI:10.1177/0969733017709336] [PMID]
25. Carlo G, Hausmann A, Christiansen S, Randall BA. Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The journal of early adolescence. 2003;23(1):107-34. [DOI:10.1177/0272431602239132]
26. Kajbaf MB, Sajjadian I, Nouri A. A Study of Factor Structur, Validity And Reliabileaty of Pro-Social Tendencies Measure Revised Questionnaire among University Students. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2010; 21(2):101-18.
27. Eckland NS, Huang AB, Berenbaum H. Empathic accuracy: Associations with prosocial behavior and self-insecurity. Emotion. 2019 13. [DOI:10.1037/emo0000622] [PMID]
28. Mojarad FA, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L. Exploring the experiences of oncology nurses about the factors facilitating their presence at the bedside of patients with cancer: A qualitative study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2019;25(2):236-41. [DOI:10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_187_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Mayer SV, Jusyte A, Klimecki-Lenz OM, Schönenberg M. Empathy and altruistic behavior in antisocial violent offenders with psychopathic traits. Psychiatry research. 2018 1;269:625-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.035] [PMID]
30. Sivaselvachandran S, Acland EL, Abdallah S, Martin LJ. Behavioral and mechanistic insight into rodent empathy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 1;91:130-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.007] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iran Journal of Nursing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb