Volume 30, Issue 109 (December 2017)
IJN 2017, 30(109): 32-43 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rezaei M, Partovi L. Abortion among Kurdish Women from Mahabad in 2016. IJN 2017; 30 (109) :32-43
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2538-en.html
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2538-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding author) Tel: 09183742329 Email: rezaeimehdi1@gmail.com
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (5302 Views)
Abstract
Background & Aim: Abortion, as one of the factors affecting maternal health, is considered as a health and social problem. This paper aimed to investigate the status of abortion among Kurdish women in Mahabad and to determine the prevalence of spontaneous abortion and induced abortion and its related factors.
Materials & Methods: This research is a cross-sectional survey. The study sample size included 360 married women, aged 15- 49 years old. Researcher constructed questionnaire was adopted for collecting data. Using cluster sampling, four regions were selected, and women were chosen through random sampling. Data were analyzed by SPSS and PLS software, and X2 and Logistic regression (P= 0.05) were adopted for analyzing the relationships of variables.
Results: A total of 30.6 % of women had experienced abortion and 34.5% of them had induced abortion. Women with high socioeconomic status mostly committed induced abortion and those with low-level socioeconomics had spontaneous abortion (x2 = 6.421, P = 0.02). Women who were employed or had high level of education mostly committed induced abortion (x2 = 28.40, P= 0.001). According to logistic regression, individualism (B = 0.612, P= 0.04), rationality (B = 0.979, P= 0.02), and adherence to religion (B =-0.987, P= 0.006) had significant impacts on committing induced abortion.
Conclusion: Unmet needs of women can affect induced abortion. Unmet needs besides religious and secular beliefs may determine the level of induced abortion in society. The increasing tendency toward individualism and instrumental rationality may increase the couples’ tendency to control the number of children. It is the case while the failure of contraception may lead to induced abortion.
Background & Aim: Abortion, as one of the factors affecting maternal health, is considered as a health and social problem. This paper aimed to investigate the status of abortion among Kurdish women in Mahabad and to determine the prevalence of spontaneous abortion and induced abortion and its related factors.
Materials & Methods: This research is a cross-sectional survey. The study sample size included 360 married women, aged 15- 49 years old. Researcher constructed questionnaire was adopted for collecting data. Using cluster sampling, four regions were selected, and women were chosen through random sampling. Data were analyzed by SPSS and PLS software, and X2 and Logistic regression (P= 0.05) were adopted for analyzing the relationships of variables.
Results: A total of 30.6 % of women had experienced abortion and 34.5% of them had induced abortion. Women with high socioeconomic status mostly committed induced abortion and those with low-level socioeconomics had spontaneous abortion (x2 = 6.421, P = 0.02). Women who were employed or had high level of education mostly committed induced abortion (x2 = 28.40, P= 0.001). According to logistic regression, individualism (B = 0.612, P= 0.04), rationality (B = 0.979, P= 0.02), and adherence to religion (B =-0.987, P= 0.006) had significant impacts on committing induced abortion.
Conclusion: Unmet needs of women can affect induced abortion. Unmet needs besides religious and secular beliefs may determine the level of induced abortion in society. The increasing tendency toward individualism and instrumental rationality may increase the couples’ tendency to control the number of children. It is the case while the failure of contraception may lead to induced abortion.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
nursing
Received: 2017/09/13 | Accepted: 2017/12/9 | Published: 2017/12/9
Received: 2017/09/13 | Accepted: 2017/12/9 | Published: 2017/12/9
References
1. Akhtari E. [Pregnancy termination from ancient Persia till present time]. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2017;19(40):1-5.
2. Abbasi M, Gooshki ES, Allahbedashti N. [Abortion in Iranian legal system]. Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 2014;13(1):71. [PMID]
3. Naghavi, M. [Burden of deasis and trauma in Iran], Menistry of Medical and Health Education, Iran, 2009.
4. Organization WH. Facts on induced abortion worldwide. World Health Organization, Geneva http://www who int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/induced_abortion_2012 pdf. 2012
5. Erfani A, McQuillan K. Rates of induced abortion in Iran: the roles of contraceptive use and religiosity. Stud Fam Plann. 2008;39(2):111-22. [DOI:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00158.x] [PMID]
6. Erfani A. Induced abortion in Tehran, Iran: estimated rates and correlates. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2011:134-42. [DOI:10.1363/3713411] [PMID]
7. Erfani A. Levels, Trends and Correlates of Abortion in Tehran, Iran: 2009–2014. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2016;42(2):93-101. [DOI:10.1363/42e1316] [PMID]
8. Chinichian M, Holakouei NK, Rafiei SK. [Voluntary Abortion in Iran: a qualitative study]. Payesh. 2007;4(14):219.
9. Agha YHT, Mehr YAH. [Estimation of induced abortion rates in Iran: Application of proximate determinants model]. Journal of Populaton association of Iran, 2007, 3 (31): 61-91.
10. Erfani A. Kazemipour S. [Abortion rate and causes of abortion in the city of Tehran], Journal of Population Association of Iran, 2011, 4 (8): 8-22.
11. Ranjbar F, Shirzad M, Kamali K, Akhondi M, Ghoodjani A, Ardakani Z, et al. [Fertility behaviour of Iranian women: A community-based cross-sectional study]. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18(1):2-5. [PMID]
12. Adamczyk A. The effects of religious contextual norms, structural constraints, and personal religiosity on abortion decisions. Soc Sci Res. 2008;37(2):657-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.09.003] [PMID]
13. Barkan SE. Gender and abortion attitudes: Religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opin Q. 2014;78(4):940-50. [DOI:10.1093/poq/nfu047]
14. Jelen TG, Wilcox C. Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly. 2003;56(4):489-500.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3219809 [DOI:10.1177/106591290305600410]
15. Ebtekar F, Riji HM, Saeedi ZA. [Kurdish womens stories of abortion in Sanandaj, Iran]. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2013;5(5):222-7.
16. Ministry of health and Medical Education. [Iran's Multiple-Indicator Demographic and Health Survey]. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2011.
17. Rezaei M. [The Contexts of Low Childbearing in Iranian Kurdistan: The Case Study of Saghez City], Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Tehran. 2011.
18. Statistics E. Population and housing census 2011. Samoa Bureau of Statistics Apia, Samoa; 2012. Retrieved from www.amar.sci.org.ir.
19. Rinderknecht L. Supporting Attitudes on Abortion With the Influence of Education and Gender. 2017 [cited 2017 15.6.2017]. Available from: http://people.oregonstate.edu/~hammerr/soc316/Education_Gender_and_Abortion.pdf
20. Trent K, Powell-Griner E. Differences in race, marital status, and education among women obtaining abortions. Soc Forces. 1991;69(4):1121-41.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2579305 [DOI:10.1093/sf/69.4.1121]
21. Mohr JC. Abortion in America: The origins and evolution of national policy: Oxford University Press; 1979.
22. Welch MR, Leege DC, Cavendish JC. Attitudes toward abortion among US Catholics: another case of symbolic politics? Social science quarterly. 1995:142-57.
23. Ghomashi S. [Induced abortion in the views of Sunnite Jurisprudence]. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2005;6(4):15.
24. Mirzadeh A. [Abortion: individualism and socialism]. Medical Ethoc Journal. 2013;7(24):24.
25. Weber M. [Economy and society]. Tehran: Samt, 2016: 51-4. 2nd ed
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
