Volume 28, Issue 98 (February 2016)                   IJN 2016, 28(98): 67-78 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Horsan H, Fathnejad Kazemi A, Sharifi N, Masjoudi M. The Psychometric Properties of the Iranian Version of Postpartum Satisfaction Nursing Care Questionnaire. IJN 2016; 28 (98) :67-78
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2271-en.html
The Psychometric Properties of the Iranian Version of Postpartum Satisfaction Nursing Care Questionnaire
H Horsan1 , A Fathnejad Kazemi2 , N Sharifi 3, M Masjoudi4
1- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2- Department of Midwifery, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz. Iran.
3- PhD Candidate of Repproductive Health, Student research office, Nursing & Midwifery School, Shahid beheshti university of medical science, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author). Tel: 09104972969 Email: Nasibeh.sharifi@sbmu.ac.ir
4- Department of Midwifery, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract:   (38446 Views)

Abstract

Background & Aim: Evaluation and measurement of mother’s satisfaction from postpartum cares is so important in the quality of health care indexes. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Postpartum Satisfaction Nursing Care Questionnaire (JPSNQ).

Material & Methods: This study was a methodological research. At the first, the English version of questionnaire was translated to Persian with regarding of the principles relating to the translation of reliability tests. By Convenience sampling, 150 women who had given birth in the hospital of Sanandaj, Iran were selected and they were completed the Persian version of questionnaire for construct validity (exploratory factor analysis). The reliability was verified by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the correlation coefficient was confirmed by 20 participants with 10 days intervals. Data were analyzed using using SPSS software version 22.

Results: The factor analysis revealed the existence of 6 factors explaining the 63.9 % of total variance explanation. The exploratory factor analysis results showed an acceptable fitting and there was a significant correlation between questions and factors. Also, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for questionnaire and the six domains were 0.94 and 0.83-0.93, respectively. Therefore there was appropriate correlation between questions, whole of questionnaire and in each domain. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.89(CI95%= CI95%=0.83-0.97) indicating good stability.

Conclusion: The Iranian version of Postpartum Satisfaction Nursing Care Questionnaire including 39 items was a valid and reliable instrument to assess the satisfaction of patients from postpartum nursing care in hospitalls.

Keywords: Satisfaction, Postpartum Care, Psychometric, Factor analysis
Full-Text [PDF 843 kb]   (2361 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing
Received: 2015/11/23 | Accepted: 2016/02/24 | Published: 2016/02/24
References
1. Alidosti M, Tahmasebi M, Raeisi M. [Evaluating the women's satisfaction of Hajar hospital services after the delivery]. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2013;2(1):1-8. [DOI:10.5812/nms.14166]
2. Changee F, Irajpour A, Simbar M, Akbari S. [Client satisfaction of maternity care in Lorestan province Iran]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(3):398. [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Peterson WE. Adolescent Mothers'satisfaction With Postpartum Nursing Care: Quantitative And Qualitative Approaches. 2004.
4. Sandin-Bojö A-K, Kvist LJ, Berg M, Wilde Larsson B. What is, could be better: Swedish women's perceptions of their intrapartal care during planned vaginal birth. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(1):81-95. [DOI:10.1108/09526861111098265] [PMID]
5. Sim-Sim MM, Marques MJ, Saruga CA. The Patient Satisfaction Scale: Validation of a Portuguese Version in Women Receiving Obstetric Care. Journal of Health Science. 2014(2):529-37.
6. Zaboli R, Sanaeinasab H. [The Challenges and Solutions for Action of Social Determinants of Health in Iran: A Qualitative Study]. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2014;2(1):5-16.
7. Stenberg K, Axelson H, Sheehan P, Anderson I, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, et al. Advancing social and economic development by investing in women's and children's health: a new Global Investment Framework. The Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1333-54. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62231-X]
8. Frei IA, Mander R. The relationship between first-time mothers and care providers in the early postnatal phase: an ethnographic study in a Swiss postnatal unit. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):716-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2009.11.004] [PMID]
9. Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, Hovsepian DA, Devereux RB, Elkind MS. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1307-15. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1311485] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Mirmolaei T, Amel Valizadeh M, Mahmoodi M, Tavakkol Z. [The effect of postpartum care at home on maternal received care and satisfaction]. Evidence Based Care. 2011;1(1):35-50.
11. Mohseni M, Bahadoran P, Abedi H. [The Quality of Postpartum Care from Mothers'viewpoint]. Hakim Research Journal. 2009;12(1):27-34.
12. Naghizadeh S, Sehhati F, Atri Barjange S, Ebrahimi H. [Comparing mothers' satisfaction from ethical dimension of care provided in labor, delivery, and postpartum phases in Tabriz's educational and non-educational hospitals in 2009]. Journal of Research & Health. 2011;1(1):82.
13. Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. [Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery]. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2010;109(3):198-200. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028] [PMID]
14. Shakeri I. [Contact doctor-patient and its role in patient satisfaction of treatment process]. Persian J Med Ethics History. 2009;2(3):9-16.
15. Nagizadeh S, Sehati F. [Assessment of Mothers' Satisfaction with the care of maternal care during Hospitalization for labor and delivery in Educational and Non-Educational Maternity Hospitals of Tabriz]. Nurs Midwifery J Tabriz. 2009;13:29-36.
16. Ahmad I, Nawaz A, Khan S, Khan H, Rashid MA, Khan MH. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;9(2).
17. Azari S, Sehaty F, Ebrahimi H. [Satisfaction of women from cesarean section care services in public and private hospitals of Tabriz]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(6):435. [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Salekzamani S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Dehghan P. Validity, Reliability and Feasibility of the Eating Behavior Pattern Questionnaire (EBPQ) among Iranian female students. Health Promotion Perspectives. 2015;5(2). [DOI:10.15171/hpp.2015.015] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Roberts P, Priest H, Traynor M. Reliability and validity in research. Nurs Stand. 2006;20(44):41-5. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.20.36.41.s58 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.05.20.36.41.c4152 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.20.44.41.s56 [DOI:10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560]
20. Drost EA. Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives. 2011;38(1):105.
21. Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2012;45(3):197-210. [DOI:10.1177/0748175612440286]
22. Hyrkäs K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(6):619-25. [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00036-1]
23. Varghese J, Rajagopal K. Development of a New Tool for Evaluating Postnatal Mother's Satisfaction Following Nursing Care: In India. Development. 2013;3(9).
24. Smith LF. Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(591):e628-e37. [DOI:10.3399/bjgp11X601334] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Peyrovi H, Bahadori A, Ashghali Farahani M, Haghani H. [Comparison of in-Patients' Satisfaction with Different Domains of Nursing Care]. Journal of Nursing Management. 2013;2(1):59-66.
26. Harvey S, Rach D, Stainton MC, Jarrell J, Brant R. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery. 2002;18(4):260-7. [DOI:10.1054/midw.2002.0317] [PMID]
27. Lomas J, Dore S, Enkin M, Mitchell A. The Labor and Delivery Satisfaction Index: the development and evaluation of a soft outcome measure. Birth. 1987;14(3):125-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.1987.tb01472.x] [PMID]
28. Redshaw M, Martin CR. Validation of a perceptions of care adjective checklist. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(2):281-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00995.x] [PMID]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iran Journal of Nursing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb