Volume 34, Issue 132 (October 2021)
IJN 2021, 34(132): 33-46 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bashiri Nejadian A, Bayazi M H, Johari Fard R, Rajaei A. Correlations of Ambivalence over Emotional Expression and Social Support with Adherence to Treatment in Cancer Patients. IJN 2021; 34 (132) :33-46
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3474-en.html
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3474-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Torbat-e Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Jam, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Torbat-e Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Jam, Iran (Corresponding author) Tel: 05152510222 Email: bayazi123@gmail.com
3- Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Torbat-e Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Jam, Iran (Corresponding author) Tel: 05152510222 Email: bayazi123@gmail.com
3- Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract: (2087 Views)
Background & Aims: Cancer is a common chronic disease that leads to numerous psychological reactions in patients and affects the reactions of individuals to the physical symptoms of the disease and adherence to treatment in patients. According to forecasts, the number of new cases of cancer in 2025 will reach more than 130,000 people in Iran, which is about 35% more than the present time. The complex and longitudinal process of cancer treatment leads to many psychological complications in patients and their families and causes severe damage to their mental health and quality of family and social life. Various studies have identified several psychological factors that affect people's reactions to physical symptoms of the disease and adherence to treatment in patients. One of the psychological factors affecting health and illness is emotion. It is believed that expressing or not expressing emotion alone cannot be problematic. What causes the problem is the conflict or ambivalence that one experiences in expressing emotion. On the other hand, expressing emotions towards others has a positive relationship with social support. Those who are ambivalent about expressing their emotions toward others are more likely to miss out on the opportunity to receive support from others; while, supporting cancer patients protects them against the negative consequences of this disease and acts like a cure, and has a strong relationship with patients' psychological performance. On the other hand, one of the important issues about patients with chronic diseases which affects the effectiveness of planned therapies is the patient's adherence to treatment. In chronic diseases in which the treatment process takes a long time, adherence to treatment usually decreases; while, adherence to treatment is one of the most important factors in controlling these diseases, and poor adherence to treatment is an alarm for both patients and health care delivery systems, because from a clinical point of view, not following the treatment can reduce the beneficial therapeutic effects, increase complications, and increase hospitalization or even death in patients. The above mentioned points and review of previous researches indicate that many studies have examined psychological variables in cancer patients. However, less attention has been paid to ambivalence over emotional eexpressions in patients and following the medication and treatment regimen and cognitive-behavioral factors involved in them. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the relationship between ambivalence over emotional eexpressions and social support with adherence to treatment in the cancer patients.
Materials & Methods: The present study is a descriptive correlational study and has employed Pearson correlation and stepwise regression methods for data analysis due to the nature of the design. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all cancer patients (based on the diagnosis of oncologist), referred to Dezful medical centers from April to June 2020. The sample of the study included 206 people (men and women) with each type of cancer selected from the mentioned population based on convenience sampling. The samples completed Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire, Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS), and General Adherence Scale (GAS). Statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS version 16 using Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression.
Results: Based on data, the average age of the sample was 44.90 years. The sample included 175 females (85%) and 31 males (15%). They had high school to master's degrees. In terms of marital status, 26 (12.6%) were single, 169 (82%) were married, and 11 (5.3%) were divorced. Regarding the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, 23 patients (11.2%) were in stage one, 95 patients (46.1%) in stage two, 73 patients (35.4%) in stage three, and 15 patients (7.3%) in stage four of the disease. Also, 37 patients (18%) reported metastatic disease and 83 patients (40.3%) reported a family history of cancer. Thirteen patients (6.3%) reported drug and tobacco use and alcohol consumption. In terms of insurance coverage and medical services, 169 (82%) of the samples were covered by insurance. Among the dimensions of ambivalence over emotional expression, the highest mean belonged to expressing negative emotions (42.59). Among the various dimensions of social support, the highest mean belonged to the emotional/information support dimension (25.53). And in general, among the three variables of ambivalence over emotional expressions, social support, and adherence to treatment, the highest mean belonged to the variables of ambivalence over emotional eexpressions (76.04), and there was a negative and significant relationship between ambivalence over emotional expressions and adherence to treatment (r=-0.184; P<0.05). However, there was no significant relationship between social support and adherence to treatment. In addition, ambivalence over emotional expressions predicted a total of 3% of adherence to treatment in cancer patients (R2=0.034).
Conclusion: Emotional changes that cancer patients experience during the various stages of diagnosis to treatment and even afterwards, as well as, the length and complexity of the treatment process and the complications of treatment and disease, can have significant effects on treatment adherence in patients. On the other hand, non-adherence to treatment is associated with several individual and social consequences, and imposes high costs on patients and their families. Given that nurses, as part of the treatment team, have the closest relationship with patients and their families during the treatment process, they can identify behavioral, cognitive, and emotional factors involved in poor adherence or non- adherence to treatment instructions to develop the necessary training and provide it to patients and their families. Also, according to the results of research on the high level of ambivalence over emotional expressions in cancer patients and its negative effects on adherence to treatment, nurses can have a significant role in reducing ambivalence over emotional expressions in patients by communicating and empathizing with patients and encouraging them to recognize and express their emotions and concerns and promote their self-expression. This way, the nurses can provide better treatment and higher quality of life for patients. The research had some limitations, including the limited and specific statistical community and it is suggested that this research be conducted in other cities and provinces and with different cultures in order to increase the generalizability of the research results. It is also suggested that due to the different complications and problems of different types of cancers in patients, this study be performed on different types of cancers separately and review the results.
Materials & Methods: The present study is a descriptive correlational study and has employed Pearson correlation and stepwise regression methods for data analysis due to the nature of the design. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all cancer patients (based on the diagnosis of oncologist), referred to Dezful medical centers from April to June 2020. The sample of the study included 206 people (men and women) with each type of cancer selected from the mentioned population based on convenience sampling. The samples completed Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire, Ambivalence over Emotional Expression Questionnaire (AEQ), Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS), and General Adherence Scale (GAS). Statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS version 16 using Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression.
Results: Based on data, the average age of the sample was 44.90 years. The sample included 175 females (85%) and 31 males (15%). They had high school to master's degrees. In terms of marital status, 26 (12.6%) were single, 169 (82%) were married, and 11 (5.3%) were divorced. Regarding the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, 23 patients (11.2%) were in stage one, 95 patients (46.1%) in stage two, 73 patients (35.4%) in stage three, and 15 patients (7.3%) in stage four of the disease. Also, 37 patients (18%) reported metastatic disease and 83 patients (40.3%) reported a family history of cancer. Thirteen patients (6.3%) reported drug and tobacco use and alcohol consumption. In terms of insurance coverage and medical services, 169 (82%) of the samples were covered by insurance. Among the dimensions of ambivalence over emotional expression, the highest mean belonged to expressing negative emotions (42.59). Among the various dimensions of social support, the highest mean belonged to the emotional/information support dimension (25.53). And in general, among the three variables of ambivalence over emotional expressions, social support, and adherence to treatment, the highest mean belonged to the variables of ambivalence over emotional eexpressions (76.04), and there was a negative and significant relationship between ambivalence over emotional expressions and adherence to treatment (r=-0.184; P<0.05). However, there was no significant relationship between social support and adherence to treatment. In addition, ambivalence over emotional expressions predicted a total of 3% of adherence to treatment in cancer patients (R2=0.034).
Conclusion: Emotional changes that cancer patients experience during the various stages of diagnosis to treatment and even afterwards, as well as, the length and complexity of the treatment process and the complications of treatment and disease, can have significant effects on treatment adherence in patients. On the other hand, non-adherence to treatment is associated with several individual and social consequences, and imposes high costs on patients and their families. Given that nurses, as part of the treatment team, have the closest relationship with patients and their families during the treatment process, they can identify behavioral, cognitive, and emotional factors involved in poor adherence or non- adherence to treatment instructions to develop the necessary training and provide it to patients and their families. Also, according to the results of research on the high level of ambivalence over emotional expressions in cancer patients and its negative effects on adherence to treatment, nurses can have a significant role in reducing ambivalence over emotional expressions in patients by communicating and empathizing with patients and encouraging them to recognize and express their emotions and concerns and promote their self-expression. This way, the nurses can provide better treatment and higher quality of life for patients. The research had some limitations, including the limited and specific statistical community and it is suggested that this research be conducted in other cities and provinces and with different cultures in order to increase the generalizability of the research results. It is also suggested that due to the different complications and problems of different types of cancers in patients, this study be performed on different types of cancers separately and review the results.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
nursing
Received: 2021/07/10 | Accepted: 2021/10/9 | Published: 2021/10/9
Received: 2021/07/10 | Accepted: 2021/10/9 | Published: 2021/10/9
References
1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941-53. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.31937] [PMID]
2. Abachizadeh K, Keramatinia A. Anticipating cancer rates of Iran in 2025. Journal of Community Health. 2016;3(1):66-73.
3. Heidarian A, Asadpour E, Mohsenzadeh F, Zahrakar K. Effect of A Group Intervention Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Quality of Life and Communication Patterns in Patients with Breast Cancer and Their Spouses. Iranian Quarterly Journal of Breast Disease. 2020;13(1):24-34. [DOI:10.30699/ijbd.13.1.24]
4. Tsai W, Lu Q. Perceived social support mediates the longitudinal relations between ambivalence over emotional expression and quality of life among Chinese American breast cancer survivors. Int j behavioral medicine. 2018;25(3):368-73. [DOI:10.1007/s12529-017-9705-9] [PMID]
5. Alavi K, Asghari Moghadam MA, Rahiminejad A, Farahani H, Allame Z. Relationship between ambivalence over emotional expression and depression: The intermediary role of interpersonal problems. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2016;11(41):27-36.
6. Uchida K, Yamasaki K. Social support mediating between coping by emotional expression and depression. Psychological reports. 2008;102(1):144-52. [DOI:10.2466/pr0.102.1.144-152] [PMID]
7. Shojaeimehr P, Karami J. The Relationship between Mental Security, Social Support and Resiliency with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Journal of Psychology. 2020;24(2):184-99.
8. Mansour-Ghanaei R, Atrkar-Roshan Z. The Relationship Between Social Supports With Depression Among Elderly in the Eastern Cities of Guilan. Tolooebehdasht. 2020;19(2):85-95.
9. Li MY, Yang YL, Liu L, Wang L. Effects of social support, hope and resilience on quality of life among Chinese bladder cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2016;14(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12955-016-0481-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Wells M, Kelly D. The loneliness of cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008; 12 (5):410-1. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2008.11.003] [PMID]
11. Hammash MH, Crawford T, Shawler C, Schrader M, Lin CY, Shewekah D, Moser DK. Beyond social support: Self-care confidence is key for adherence in patients with heart failure. Euro J Cardiovascular Nurs. 2017;16(7):632-7. [DOI:10.1177/1474515117705939] [PMID]
12. Tan BK, Chua SS, Chen LC, Chang KM, Balashanker S, Bee PC. Efficacy of a medication management service in improving adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial. Supp Care Cancer. 2020;28(7):3237-47.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05133-0 [DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-05212-2] [PMID]
13. Shirkavand L, Alaee Karahroudy F, Mohtashami J, Ghasemi E. Effects of Coping Style Training on the Treatment Adherence in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease. Iran Journal Of Nursing (IJN). 2019;32(119):70-9. [DOI:10.29252/ijn.32.119.70]
14. King LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: psychological and physical correlates. J person social psychol. 1990;58(5):864. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.864]
15. Alavi K, Asghari Moghadam MA, Rahiminezhad A, Farahani H. Psychometric properties of ambivalence over emotional expression questionnaire. Journal of Research in psychological health. 2017;11(1):74-91. [DOI:10.29252/rph.11.1.74]
16. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Social science & medicine. 1991;32(6):705-14. [DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B]
17. Lyons SJ. The Role of social support and psychological resourse in depression in people living with HIV/AIDS: examing the mediating role of mastery and self-esteem. Master of Arts Thesis. 2010.
18. Mohammadzadeh J, Sayehmiri K. Standardization of social support scale (MOS) of adults who have chronic diseases in Ilam, 2015. scientific journal of ilam university of medical sciences. 2016;23(7):69-77.
19. Hays RD, Kravitz RL, Mazel RM, Sherbourne CD, DiMatteo MR, Rogers WH, Greenfield S. The impact of patient adherence on health outcomes for patients with chronic disease in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Medic. 1994;17(4):347-60. [DOI:10.1007/BF01858007] [PMID]
20. Zarani F, Zamani R, Besharat MA, Ehsan HB, Rahiminejad A, Sadeghian S. Effectiveness of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model in the adherence rate of coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Psychological Research. 2010;12(3-4),24:24-43.
21. Zahednezhad H, Poursharifi H, Babapour J. Relationship betweeh health locus of control, memory, and physician-Patient relationship with satisfaction of treatment in type II diabetic patients. Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2011;9(2):67-75.
22. Haskett ME, Stelter R, Proffit K, Nice R. Parent emotional expressiveness and children's self-regulation: Associations with abused children's school functioning. Child abuse & neglect. 2012;36(4):296-307. [DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.11.008] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. de Veld DM, Riksen-Walraven JM, de Weerth C. The relation between emotion regulation strategies and physiological stress responses in middle childhood. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(8):1309-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.01.004] [PMID]
24. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological bulletin. 2008;134(1):1-30. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1] [PMID]
25. Safarzade S, Savari K. Application of Acceptance and Commitment Theory (ACT) on Anxiety Personality Trait, Alexithymia and Adherence to Treatment in Women with Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020; 18(1): 17-27.
26. Burnard P, Edwards D, Bennett K, Tothova V, Baldacchino D, Bara P, Mytevelli J. A comparative, longitudinal study of stress in student nurses in five countries: Albania, Brunei, the Czech Republic, Malta and Wales. Nurse Education Today. 2008;28(2):134-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2007.04.002] [PMID]
27. Fritzsche K, McDaniel SH, Wirsching M, editors. Psychosomatic Medicine: An International Guide for the Primary Care Setting. Springer Nature; 2019. P:173-89. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-27080-3]
28. Amiri S, Ghasemi Gheshlagh M, Abbas Zadeh Z. Comparison of emotional structures (Ambivalence and Alexithymia) and personality traits based on brain-behavioral systems in patients and normal individuals. SSU_Journals. 2018;26(1):16-26.
29. Ji LL, Tsai W, Sun XL, Lu Q, Wang HD, Wang LJ, Lu GH. The detrimental effects of ambivalence over emotional expression on well‐being among Mainland Chinese breast cancer patients: Mediating role of perceived social support. Psycho‐oncology. 2019;28(5):1142-8. [DOI:10.1002/pon.5069] [PMID]
30. Guan M, Han JY, Shah DV, Gustafson DH. Exploring the Role of Social Support in Promoting Patient Participation in Health Care among Women with Breast Cancer. Health Communication. 2020:1-9. [DOI:10.1080/10410236.2020.1773704] [PMID]
31. Mondesir FL, Carson AP, Durant RW, Lewis MW, Safford MM, Levitan EB. Association of functional and structural social support with medication adherence among individuals treated for coronary heart disease risk factors: Findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0198578. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0198578] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Gu L, Wu S, Zhao S, Zhou H, Zhang S, Gao M, Qu Z, Zhang W, Tian D. Association of social support and medication adherence in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1522. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph14121522] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Seyedfatemi N, Zeinali E, Bahremand M, Mehran A, Zeinali M. The Relationship Between Medication Adherence and Coping Skills in Patients With Heart Failure. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 2019;27(2):89-96. [DOI:10.30699/sjhnmf.27.2.89]
34. Mikaili N, Ghasemi MA, Salari S, Sakeni Z. Theoretical and practical dimensions of adherence to treatment in patients: a review study. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2019;62(2):1403-19.
35. Kim JH, Kim GS, Kim EJ, Park S, Chung N, Chu SH. Factors affecting medication adherence and anticoagulation control in Korean patients taking warfarin. J Cardiovas Nurs. 2011;26(6):466-74. [DOI:10.1097/JCN.0b013e31820914e7] [PMID]
36. Emilsson M, Berndtsson I, Lötvall J, Millqvist E, Lundgren J, Johansson Å, Brink E. The influence of personality traits and beliefs about medicines on adherence to asthma treatment. Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 2011;20(2):141-7. [DOI:10.4104/pcrj.2011.00005] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Leventhal H, Cameron, L. Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Educ Couns. 1987; 10: 117-138. [DOI:10.1016/0738-3991(87)90093-0]
38. Narimani M, Maleki PM, Mikaeili N, Abolghasemi A. Appraisal of Effectiveness and Comparison of Exposure and Response Prevention Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Act)-Based Training on Improving of Obsessive and Compulsive Disorder Patients'components of Life Quality. Journal Of Clinical Psychology. 2016;29(1):25-36.
39. Alipour A, Aliakbari DM, Amini F, Hashemi JA. Relationship between perceived social support and adherence of treatment in Diabetes mellitus type 2: mediating role of resillency and hope. Research In Psychological Health. 2016;10(2):53-67.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
