Volume 27, Issue 89 (Aug 2014)                   IJN 2014, 27(89): 30-39 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zamanzadeh V, Jasemi M, Mansoori A, Khodabandeh F, Alsadat Hoseini F. Doctoral Nursing Students’ Perspectives towards Educational Quality of PhD Course. IJN 2014; 27 (89) :30-39
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1837-en.html
1- Associate professor, Medical Education Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz university of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Doctoral candidate in nursing education, Students’ Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.(Corresponding author) Tel: +98 09144462842 Email: jasemi_phd@yahoo.com
3- Master degree in Midwifery Education, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Lecturer, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (7481 Views)


  Background & Aims: Regarding the rapid increase in the number of doctoral students in nursing, evaluation of PhD course to ensure quality of education is necessary. By the assessment of doctoral program from the viewpoint of the students, this study aims to provide a clear picture of the educational quality of this course.

  Material & Methods: In this descriptive study, 64 doctoral students recruited by census from the nursing and midwifery schools of Tabriz, Shiraz, Mashhad and Tehran University of medical sciences were surveyed. Quality of PhD nursing course was evaluated by international questionnaire of QCSI (quality criteria, standards and indicators ) in three dimensions of educational programs, faculty and resources. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics using SPSS-PC (v. 13.5).

  Results: The mean score of doctoral students’ point of view in the three parts of educational programs (48.4±3.17), faculty (31.42±2.03) and resources (18.95±2.76) was moderate. In the dimension of educational programs, components of emphasizing the research ( 49.3 ±0.67) and teachers’ support of students ( 3.32 ± 0.64) were more satisfied by students. The students were dissatisfied with the adequacy of faculty members (1.37 ± 0.77) and relevance of doctoral courses with nursing profession (1.84 ± 0.66). In the faculty dimension, students had been criticized the teachers’ performance for the supervision of dissertations (1.15 ± 0.60), and teachers’ knowledge (1.67 ± 0.87). In the resource dimension, students were dissatisfied of the adequacy of financial resources (1.95 ± 0.75) and necessary infrastructure for research (1.98 ± 0.66).

  Conclusion: Regarding the intermediate quality of doctoral course of nursing in the dimensions of curriculum , faculty and resources , revising the content of courses , increasing the number of faculty members and improvement of the resources are necessary to improve the quality of the course. 

Full-Text [PDF 612 kb]   (2279 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing
Received: 2014/05/14 | Accepted: 2014/08/11 | Published: 2014/08/11

1. Ketefian S, Davidson P, Daly J, Chang E, Srisuphan W. Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing Health Sciences. 2005;7(3):150-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00240.x] [PMID]
2. Nagata S, Gregg MF, Miki Y, Arimoto A, Murashima S, Kim MJ. Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):361-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019] [PMID]
3. Farahani M, Ahmadi F. [Doctoral nursing students 'viewpoint about doctoral nursing program]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2006;6(1):83-92.
4. Pearson M. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: Implications for quality management, improvement and innovation. Higher Education Research and Development. 1999;18(3):269-87. [DOI:10.1080/0729436990180301]
5. McKenna H. Doctoral education: Some treasonable thoughts. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;42(3):245-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.01.001] [PMID]
6. Arimoto A, Gregg MF, Nagata S, Miki Y, Murashima S. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan by faculty members and their educational and research activities. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(5):e1-e7. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.06.007] [PMID]
7. Anderson CA. Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: Are we prepared for the future. J Prof Nurs. 2000;16(4):191-200. [DOI:10.1053/jpnu.2000.7830] [PMID]
8. Ketefian S, Mckenna H P. Doctoral education in nursing international perspective. London: Abingdon; 2005.
9. Dolmans D, Wolfhagen H, Scherpbier A. From quality assurance to total quality management: how can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education? Education for Health (Abingdon, England). 2003;16(2):210-7. [DOI:10.1080/1357628031000116899] [PMID]
10. Kjellgren KI, Welin C, Danielson E. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs–A review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Educ Today. 2005;25(4):316-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002] [PMID]
11. Tazakori Z, Mazaheri E, Namnabat M, Torabizadeh K, Fathi S, Ebrahimi F. [Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs by CIPP framework.Scientific and research]. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery of Ardebil. 2011;11,44-51.
12. Nagata S, Gregg MF, Miki Y, Arimoto A, Murashima S, Kim MJ. Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):361-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019] [PMID]
13. Cleary M, Horsfall J, Hunt GE. Top tips for PhD thesis examination: Nurse clinicians, researchers and novices. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(1):7-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.004] [PMID]
14. Evans C, Stevenson K. The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(2):239-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iran Journal of Nursing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb