Volume 30, Issue 106 (June 2017)
IJN 2017, 30(106): 11-22 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khatib Zanjani N, Ajam A, Badnava S. Determining the Relationship Between Self-directed Learning Readiness and Acceptance of E-learning and Academic Achievement of Students. IJN 2017; 30 (106) :11-22
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2435-en.html
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2435-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame noor University,Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame noor University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author) Tel: 09159341880 E-mail: aliakbarajam1387@gmail.com
3- MA, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame noor University,Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame noor University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author) Tel: 09159341880 E-mail: aliakbarajam1387@gmail.com
3- MA, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame noor University,Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (8939 Views)
Abstract
Background & Aims: The objective of the present research was to determine the relationship of self-directed learning (SDL) readiness with acceptance of electronic learning and academic progress of nursing and midwifery university students in 2014.
Material & Methods: The study population for this descriptive correlational research included all the M.S. students at Nursing and Midwifery School of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. The total sample size was calculated to be 200, using the quota stratified sampling method, based on the Krejcie-Morgan tables. To collect data, the Fisher et al.’s self-directed learning readiness scale (2001), the electronic learning scale based on TAM (Technology Admission Model), and academic average of students in the first semester of 2014 was used. To analyze the data by SPSS V.16, the MANOVA statistical tests, and multiple regression analysis were used.
Results: Research results indicated that there is no significant difference between different dimensions of self-directed learning readiness of male and female students (P>0.05). Moreover, self-directed learning readiness has a significant relationship with electronic learning and academic progress (P<0.01). Self-directed learning readiness is also a suitable predictor of the acceptance of electronic learning and academic progress of university students.
Conclusion: Considering the importance of the role of self-directed readiness, it is recommended to carry out further studies on factors influencing self-directed learning. Training courses for increasing the self-directed readiness of university students are also recommended.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
nursing
Received: 2017/03/6 | Accepted: 2017/06/6 | Published: 2017/06/6
Received: 2017/03/6 | Accepted: 2017/06/6 | Published: 2017/06/6
References
1. Jafari Sani H, Mohamadzadeh Ghasr A, Garavand H, Hosseini SA. [Learning Styles and Their Correlation with Self-Directed Learning Readiness in Nursing and Midwifery Students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2013;12(11):842-53.
2. Monroe KS. The relationship between assessment methods and self-directed learning readiness in medical education. Int J Med Educ 2016;11(7) :75- 80. [DOI:10.5116/ijme.56bd.b282] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Saeid N, Alinejad M, Godarzi M. [The Effects of Cognitive and Meta-cognitive Strategies Training on Self-directed Learning Readiness]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2015;6(1):39-47.
4. Grandinetti M. Predictors of Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Nursing Students. US-China Education Review. 2015;5(7):443-56. [DOI:10.17265/2161-623X/2015.07A.001]
5. Fisher MJ, King J. The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(1):44-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020] [PMID]
6. Francom GM. Teach me how to learn: Principles for fostering students' self-directed learning skills. International journal of self-directed learning. 2010;7(1):29-44.
7. Rashid T, Asghar HM. Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:604-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084]
8. Ahanchian MR, Garavand H, Mohammadzadeghasr A, Hosseini SAA. [Standardization of self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing and midwifery students]. Strides in Development of Medical education. 2013;10(1):70-7. Persian
9. Barnard L, Lan WY, To YM, Paton VO, Lai S-L. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education. 2009;12(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005]
10. Smedley A. The self-directed learning readiness of first year bachelor of nursing students. J Res Nurs. 2007;12(4):373-85. [DOI:10.1177/1744987107077532]
11. Khiat H. Academic performance and the practice of self-directed learning: The adult student perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2017;41(1):44-59. [DOI:10.1080/0309877X.2015.1062849]
12. Zarif Sanaee N. [Assessing the criteria for the quality and effectiveness of e-Learning in higher education]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2011;1(3):24-32.
13. Eslaminejad T, Nakhaee N. [Self-Directed Learning Readiness Factors in Physicians for Implementing E-Learning in the Continuing Medical Education Programs]. E-Learning-Engineering, On-Job Training and Interactive Teaching: InTech; 2012.
14. Bracey P, editor Self-directed Learning vs Self-regulated Learning: Twins or Just Friends? E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education; 2010: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 2010: 1600-7.
15. Attaran M. [The Phenomenological Exploration of the Learners' Interaction in Virtual Universities]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2011;2(2):2-10.
16. Kwan R. Enhancing learning through technology: Research on emerging technologies and pedagogies: World Scientific; 2008. [DOI:10.1142/6801]
17. Chang V. Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36(3):476-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.007]
18. Ballantyne N. Object lessons: A "learning object" approach to e-learning for social work education. J Technol Hum Serv. 2007;25(1-2):1-16. [DOI:10.1300/J017v25n01_01]
19. Khorasani A, Abdolmaleki J, Zahedi H. [Factors affecting E-Learning acceptance among students of tehran university of medical sciences based on technology acceptance model (TAM)]. Iranian journal of medical education. 2012;11(6):664-73.
20. Tamannaifar M, Gandomi Z. [Correlation between achievement motivation and academic achievement in university students]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2011;4(1):15-9.
21. Abdullah F, Ward R. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput Human Behav. 2016;56:238-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036]
22. Teo T. Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments. 2016;24(4):745-57. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2014.917110]
23. Kim YG, Woo E. Consumer acceptance of a quick response (QR) code for the food traceability system: Application of an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Food Research International. 2016;85:266-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2016.05.002] [PMID]
24. Song L, Hill JR. A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 2007;6(1):27-42.
25. Saeid N, Mehrabi M. [Effectiveness of Teaching Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies on Strengthen their, Student Self-Directed Learning Readiness and Self Efficacy]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2013;4(3):29-39.
26. Brindley JE. Learner support in online distance education: essential and evolving. Online distance education Towards a research agenda. 2014:287-310.
27. Fisher M, King J, Tague G. Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2001;21(7):516-25. [DOI:10.1054/nedt.2001.0589] [PMID]
28. Nadi MA, Sadjadian I. [Validation of a Self-directed Learning Readiness Scale for Medical and Dentistry Students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011;11(2):174-82.
29. Nadi MA. [Medical and Dentistry Students' Perceptions of Self directed Learning and its Relationship with Personal Traits]. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2012;8(2):173-81.
30. Naeimi L, Bigdeli S, Soltani Arabshahi K. [Level of self-directed learning readiness in medical students]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2012;5(3):177-81.
31. Chu R, Tsai CC. Self‐directed learning readiness, Internet self‐efficacy and preferences towards constructivist Internet‐based learning environments among higher‐aged adults. J Comput Assist Learn. 2009;25(5):489-501. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00324.x]
32. Wilson K, Narayan A. Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology. 2016;36(2):236-53. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2014.926312]
33. Barnard-Brak L, Paton VO, Lan WY. Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2010;11(1):61-80. [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769]
34. Alotaibi KN. The learning environment as a mediating variable between self-directed learning readiness and academic performance of a sample of saudi nursing and medical emergency students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;36:249-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.003] [PMID]
35. Rana S, Rana S, Ardichvili A, Ardichvili A, Polesello D, Polesello D. Promoting self-directed learning in a learning organization: tools and practices. European Journal of Training and Development. 2016;40(7):470-89. [DOI:10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0076]
36. Stewart RA. Investigating the link between self directed learning readiness and project-based learning outcomes: the case of international Masters students in an engineering management course. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2007;32(4):453-65. [DOI:10.1080/03043790701337197]
37. Song D, Bonk CJ. Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education. 2016;3(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838]
38. Okuonghae O, Ogiamien LO. Information literacy skills as correlates of library user satisfaction among undergraduates in Nigeria. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. 2016;7(2):46-55.
39. Aparicio M, Bacao F, Oliveira T. An e-learning theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2016;19(1):292.-307.
40. El-Gilany A-H, Abusaad FES. Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among Saudi undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1040-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.003] [PMID]
41. Kek M, Huijser H. Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and self‐directed learning readiness at a Malaysian university. Studies in higher education. 2011;36(2):185-208. [DOI:10.1080/03075070903519210]
42. Abraham RR, Fisher M, Kamath A, Izzati TA, Nabila S, Atikah NN. Exploring first-year undergraduate medical students9 self-directed learning readiness to physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(4):393-5. [DOI:10.1152/advan.00011.2011] [PMID]
43. Klunklin A, Viseskul N, Sripusanapan A, Turale S. Readiness for self‐directed learning among nursing students in Thailand. Nurs Health Sci. 2010;12(2):177-81. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00515.x] [PMID]
44. Ajam Aa. [The Role of Self-Directed Learning Readiness and Critical Thinking Disposition in Students' Interaction in Blended Learning Environment]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2015;15:215-26.
45. Ajam A. [The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy and Interpersonal Relations Skills of Students in the evaluation based on Blending Learning]. Research in Medical Education. 2015;7(1):3-12 [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.7.1.3]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
