Volume 35, Issue 136 (June 2022)                   IJN 2022, 35(136): 162-177 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Samadi Beiram Z, Omrani S, Haghani S. Effectiveness of Online Patient Safety Education on the Competency of Nurses in Intensive Care Units: A Quasi-experimental Study. IJN 2022; 35 (136) :162-177
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3258-en.html
1- Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , samadizohre1391@gmail.com
3- Department of Distance education planning, Iran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 6388 kb]   (527 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1581 Views)
Full-Text:   (723 Views)
Introduction
Maintaining patient safety (PS) is one of professional and ethical duties of health care providers. Nurses, as the largest professional group in the health system, have a potential and significant power in influencing health care quality. Their competency in PS is essential to ensure quality and safe care. PS competency is defined as " the attitudes, skills, and knowledge that health care workers must have to protect patients from unnecessary risks and hazards”. Education plays a vital role in improving PS and providing high quality health and nursing care. Education is provided by traditional or online methods. It is clear that educational strategies, in addition to consolidating knowledge and skills, need to create motivation, encourage interactions between learners, facilitate learning, and have the necessary flexibility. There are various e-learning methods such as web-based learning, computer-assisted learning and online learning. Although these methods have advantages, they are some disadvantages such as lack of proper communication with the teacher, difficulty in using the system and interact with technology, the necessity for active participation of the individual in training, and increased time required to get feedback from homework. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of online PS education on the competence of nurses in ICUs.
Materials & Methods
This is a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test/post-test design that was conducted in 2020 in Tehran, Iran. Participants were 50 nurses working in the ICUs who were selected by a stratified method from Hazrate Rasoole Akram Hospital and Firoozgar Hospital affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences. Inclusion criteria were at least a bachelor's degree in nursing, at least six months of clinical experience in the ICU, ability to use computer or having a smartphone and Internet access. Exclusion criteria were: Leaving the ICU before completing the study for any reason and not using the educational content. The educational program was provided online, focusing on PS issues. The educational contents were presented in the form of text, audio, image, and video. The program included a test designed to assess the nurses' learning, which was given to the nurses once every four days for two months. Before and three months after the intervention, data were collected using a patient safety competency self-evaluation (PSCSE) questionnaire which has three subscales of PS knowledge, attitude and skills. In the knowledge subscale, two dimensions of “concept of the components of PS culture” and “concept of error and cause analysis" are measured by 6 items. in the attitude subscale, four dimensions of "PS promotion/prevention strategy”, “responsibility of health care professionals for PS culture”, “error reporting and disclosing”, and “Components of PS culture" are measured by 14 items. in the skills subscale, six dimensions "error reporting and error response”, “communication related to error”, “resource utilization/evidence-based practice”, “safe nursing practice”, “infection prevention”, “Precise communication during handoffs" are measured by 21 items. The total score ranges 41-205. The highest score in each subscale indicates high PS knowledge, skill or attitude. The highest overall score indicates high competence in PS. In our study, the face validity of PSCSE was examined based on the opinions of 20 nurses and the necessary corrections were made. The content validity of the questionnaire was determined by using the opinions of three experts. The instrument's internal stability was determined by calculating Cronbach's alpha, which was obtained 0.868 for the knowledge subscale, 0.824 for the attitude subscale, 0.911 for the skills subscale, and 0.922 for the overall scale. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (paired t-test, Wilcoxon test) in SPSS software, version 22.
Results
The mean age of the nurses was 32.7±5.73 years. Most of the nurses were female (88%) and married (56%). Their mean work experience in the ICU was 2.57±3.47 years. Furthermore, 46% had permanent employment, 68% had rotating shifts, and 62% had an experience of in-service training related to PS about 2.62±2.28 years ago. Furthermore, 80% had no any errors in patient care in the last three months. The mean scores of PS knowledge (21.75±3.28), attitude (61.52±4.19), and skill (84.66 ±53.7) after the intervention were significantly higher compared to their pretest scores (P<0.001). The mean of total competency score (167.93±11.61) after the intervention was also significantly higher. Results showed that the educational program improved the nurses' competence by 17.86%. The education had the highest effect on PS knowledge, followed by PS skills and attitudes.
Discussion
Online education can increase PS knowledge, skills, and attitudes in ICU nurses and can ultimately promote their competence in PS. Nursing managers can use e-learning method to provide in-service training and retraining courses on familiarity with patients safety concepts, which can help manage medical errors caused by nurses. This learning method is recommended for nurses working in ICUs, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

The ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Science, approved this study.(Code:IR.IUMS.REC.1398.373). 

Funding
This project was funded by Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. 

Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally in preparing all parts of the research.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the supporting Administration as well as all staff of the study setting who helped us conduct this study.


References
  1. Gonzalez Lopez JJ, Hernandez Martinez P, Munoz Negrete FJ. Medical errors and patient safety in Ophthalmology. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017; 92(7):299-301. [DOI:10.1016/j.oftale.2017.03.011]
  2. Sadoughi F, Ahmadi M, Moghaddasi H, Sheikhtaheri A. [Patient safety information system: Purpose, structure and functions (Persian)]. J Mazand Univ Med Sci. 2011; 21(85):174-88. [Link]
  3. Häggström M, Holmstrom MR, Jong M. Establishing patient safety in intensive care- A grounded theory. Open J Nurs. 2017; 7(10):1157-7. [DOI:10.4236/ojn.2017.710084]
  4. Pronovost PJ, Sutcliffe KM, Basu L, Dixon-Woods M. Changing the narratives for patient safety. Bull World Health Organ. 2017; 95(6):478-80. [DOI:10.2471/BLT.16.178392] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013; 9(3): 122-8. [DOI:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69] [PMID]
  6. Bayatmanesh H, Zagheri Tafreshi M, Manoochehri H, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. [Patient safety observation by nurses working in the intensive care units of selected hospitals affiliated to Yasuj University of Medical Sciences (Persian)]. Iran South Med J. 2019; 21(6):493-506. [Link]
  7. Marzban S, Maleki M, Nasiri pour A, Jahangiri K. [Assessment of patient safety management system in ICU (Persian)]. J Inflamm Dis. 2013; 17(5):47-55. [Link]
  8. Sheikhbaklu M, Hemmati Maslakpak M, Baghaei R. [Patients safety status in intensive care unit of Urmia hospitals from nurses viewpoint (Persian)]. Nurs Midwifery J. 2013; 11(6):404-9. [Link]
  9. Jahangiri K, Marzban S,Nasiripour A, Maleki M. [Assessment of patient safety management system in ICU (Persian)]. J Inflamm Dis. 2013; 17(5):47-55. [Link]
  10. Bayatmanesh H, Zagheri Tafreshi M, Mnoochehri H, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. [Evaluation of patient-related nursing care with standards in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (Persian)]. Armaghan-e- Danesh. 2017; 22(3):375-89. [Link]
  11. Najafpour Z, Mahmoodi M, Pourreaza A. [Analysis of patient safety indicators in hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences: Recommendations for improving patient safety (Persian)]. J Hosp. 2015; 13(4):53-61. [Link]
  12. Negarandeh R, Pedram S, Khosravinezhad M. [Effect of clinically competent nurses services on safety and patient’s satisfaction in an emergency department (Persian)]. J Hayat. 2013; 19(1):53-64. [Link]
  13. Oliveri M, Elledge C, Boyle D, Collins MB. Improving Patient Outcomes: It’s All About Teamwork. Paper presented at: ONS 42nd Annual Congress. 4–7 May 2017: Denver, Colorado, US. [Link]
  14. Denver.Hwang JI. What are hospital nurses’ strengths and weaknesses in patient safety competence? Findings from three Korean hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015; 27(3):232-8. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzv027] [PMID]
  15. Montisano Marchi N. Fostering patient safety knowledge, skills and attitudes with bachelor of science in nursing students using active learning strategies [PhD dissertation]. Ohio: Case Western Reserve University; 2014. [Link]
  16. Brasaitė I. Health care professionals’ knowledge and attitudes regarding patient safety and skills for safe patient care. Tampere: University of Tampere; 2016. [Link]
  17. Shayestehfard M, Zarreh Hoshyari Khah H, Sheibani T. [Safety competence in nurses: A qualitative indicator of providing patient care (Persian)]. Paper presented at: National conference on ways to improve the quality of nursing and midwifery services. 4 February 2015; Yazd, Iran. [Link]
  18. Murray M, Sundin D, Cope V. New graduate registered nurses’ knowledge of patient safety and practice: A literature review.  J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27(1-2):31-47. [DOI:10.1111/jocn.13785] [PMID]
  19. Mansour MJ, Al Shadafan SF, Abu-Sneineh FT, AlAmer MM. Integrating patient safety education in the undergraduate nursing curriculum: A discussion paper. Open Nurs J. 2018; 12:125-32. [DOI:10.2174/1874434601812010125] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Kardan Barzoki E, Bakhshandeh H, Nikpajouh A, Elahi E, Haghjoo M. [Comparison of the effect of education through lecture and multimedia methods on knowledge, attitude, and performance of cardiac care (Persian)]. Iran J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016; 4(4):6-13. [Link]
  21. Steven A, Magnusson C, Smith P, Pearson PH. Patient safety in nursing education: Contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Educ Today. 214; 34(2):277-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.025] [PMID]
  22. Karimi Moonaghi H , Armat MR. [Using webquest in medical education (Persian)]. Iran J Med Educ. 2013; 13(5):353-63.[Link]
  23. Van Horn ER, Hyde YM, Tesh AS, Kautz DD. Teaching pathophysiology: Strategies to enliven the traditional lecture. Nurse Educ. 2014; 39(1):34-7. [DOI:10.1097/01.NNE.0000437364.19090.be] [PMID]
  24. Kayzouri A,  Sadeghpour M. [A comparison on the effects of traditional, E-learning and traditional-E learning on the pharmacology course of nursing students (Persian)]. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2017; 24:123-7. [Link]
  25. Miller CJ, McNear J, Metz MJ. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013; 37(4):347-55. [DOI:10.1152/advan.00050.2013] [PMID]
  26. Gooshi M, Siratim M, Khaghanizade M. Utilization conditions of virtual education at continuing education for nurses: A review. Int J Med Rev. 2014; 1(3):111-8. [Link]
  27. Cook NF, McAloon T, O'Neill P, Beggs R. Impact of a web based interactive simulation game (PULSE) on nursing students’ experience and performance in life support training: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32(6):714-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.013] [PMID]
  28. Cheng YM. The effects of information systems quality on nurses’ acceptance of the electronic learning system. J Nurs Res. 2012; 20(1):19-30. [DOI:10.1097/JNR.0b013e31824777aa] [PMID]
  29. Dalhem WA, Saleh N, Kaminski J, Bassendowski S, Okunji P, Hill M. The impact of eLearning on nurses’ professional knowledge and practice in HMC. Can J Nurs Inform. 2014; 9(3-4):1-14. [Link]
  30. Sheikh Abumasoudi R, Soltani Mollayaghobi N. [Comparison the effect of electronic learning and teaching based on lecture on knowledge of nursing students about heart dysrhythmias in 2014: A short report (Persian)]. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2015; 14(4):339-44. [Link]
  31. Khatoni A, Nayery N, Ahmady F, Haghani H. [Comparison the effect of web-based education and traditional education on nurses knowledge about bird flu in continuing education (Persian)]. Iran J Med Educ. 2011; 11(2):140-8. [Link]
  32. Hajli M, Bugshan H, Lin X , Featherman M. From e-learning to social learning - a health care study. Eur J Train Dev. 2013; 37(9):851-63. [DOI:10.1108/EJTD-10-2012-0062]
  33. Katoua T, AL-Lozi M, Alrowwad A. A review of literature on E-Learning systems in higher education. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res. 2016; 7(5):754-62. [Link]
  34. Hoq MZ. E-Learning during the period of pandemic (COVID-19) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An empirical Study. Am J Educ Res. 2020; 8(7):457-64. [Link]
  35. Tingle J. Patient safety and litigation in the NHS post-COVID-19. Br J Nurs.  2020; 29(7):444-5. [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2020.29.7.444] [PMID]
  36. Pourteimour S, Hemmati Maslakpak M, Jasemi M. [The effect of e-learning on the knowledge, attitude and practice of nursing students about the prevention of drug errors in the pediatric unit. (Persian)]. Nurs Midwifery J. 2018; 16(1):12-21. [Link]
  37. Gaupp R, Dinius J, Drazic I, Körner M. Long-term effects of an e-learning course on patient safety: A controlled longitudinal study with medical students. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210947. [PMID] [PMCID]
  38. AbuAlRub RF, Abu Alhijaa EH. The impact of educational interventions on enhancing perceptions of patient safety culture among Jordanian senior nurses. Nursing Forum. 2014; 49(2):139-50. [DOI:10.1111/nuf.12067] [PMID]
  39. Jang H, Lee NJ. Patient safety competency and educational needs of nursing educators in South Korea. PloS One. 2017; 12(9):e0183536. [PMID] [PMCID]
  40. Lee NJ, An JY, Song TM, Jang H, Park SY. Psychometric evaluation of a patient safety competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2014; 53(10):550-62. [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20140922-01] [PMID]
  41. Atack L, Luke R. Impact of an online course on infection control and prevention competencies. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 63(2):175-80. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04660.x] [PMID]
  42. Mccarthy SE, O’Boyle CA, O’shaughnessy A, Walsh G. Online patient safety education programme for junior doctors: Is it worthwhile? Ir J Med Sci. 2016; 185(1):51-8. [DOI:10.1007/s11845-014-1218-9] [PMID]
  43. Pakzad N, Norouzi K, Fallahi Khoshknab M , Norouzi M. [A comparison of the effect of virtual and lecture-based patient safety education on patient safety culture among nurses (Persian)]. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2016; 10(9):27-34. [Link]
  44. Johnson M, Hime N, Zheng C, Tran D, Kelly L , Siric K. Differences in nurses’ knowledge, behavior and patient falls incidents and severity following a falls e-learning program. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2014; 4(4):28-36. [DOI:10.5430/jnep.v4n4p28]
  45. Mahmodi Shan G, Royani Z, Kord F, Kazemi S B, Ghana S, Rahimian S, et al . Effect of In-Person and E-Training on Nurse Managers' Perception of Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals of the Golestan Province, Iran. Journal of Clinical and Basic Research. 2019; 3(1):34-9. [DOI:10.29252/jcbr.3.1.34]
  46. Hanifi N, Yazdanshenas Z, Namadian M, Motamed N. The effect of patient safety educational program on nurses’ patient safety culture and patient safety indicators. Asian/Pac Island Nurs J. 2018; 3(1):21-9. [DOI:10.31372/20180301.1089]
  47. Morente L, Morales Asencio JM, Veredas FJ. Effectiveness of an e-learning tool for education on pressure ulcer evaluation. J Clin Nurs. 2014; 23(13-14):2043-52. [DOI:10.1111/jocn.12450] [PMID]
  48. Bloomfield J, Roberts J, While A. The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(3): 287-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003] [PMID]
  49. Mamashli L, Varaei S. Study the effect of multimedia safety injection on nurses’ performance at three levels during preparation, during injection and after injection. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2019; 9(2):80-9. [Link]
  50. Olum R, Atulinda L, Kigozi E, Nassozi DR, Mulekwa A, Bongomin F, et al. Medical education and E-Learning during covid-19 pandemic: Awareness, attitudes, preferences, and barriers among undergraduate medicine and nursing students at Makerere University, Uganda. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020; 7:2382120520973212. [DOI:10.1177/2382120520973212] [PMID] [PMCID]

 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing
Received: 2021/01/5 | Accepted: 2022/06/22 | Published: 2022/07/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iran Journal of Nursing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb