Volume 27, Issue 90 And 91 (October ِDecember 2014 2014)
IJN 2014, 27(90 And 91): 110-119 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bayrami M, Kharazi Notash H, Alilou M. Visual Graphic Characteristics of Family Members in Unaccompanied Children and Normal Counterparts. IJN 2014; 27 (90 and 91) :110-119
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1921-en.html
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1921-en.html
1- Professor of psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2- Master of Clinical Psychology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (٭Corresponding author). Tel: +98 09361176526 Email: clinicalpsychologist.notash@gmail.com
2- Master of Clinical Psychology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (٭Corresponding author). Tel: +98 09361176526 Email: clinicalpsychologist.notash@gmail.com
Abstract: (6912 Views)
Abstract
Background & Aim: Attention to children’s visual graphics is a way to recognize their inner world. The study aims to compare the components of visual graphic of family members and drawing family members as animals in unaccompanied children and their normal counterparts.
Martial & Methods: It was a descriptive comparative study. The sample consisted of 60, 7-10 year old boys (30 unaccompanied and 30 normal counterparts) who were recruited by simple randomized sampling method in 2013 and were assessed by DAP painting test. Data was analyzed by Chi-square test using SPSS-PC (v. 21).
Results: There were significant differences between the groups in turns of added character, protagonist's parents, removed parents, order in painting, parents as disturbing animals, children as lovable animals and father as predatory animal (P< 0.01). However, there were no significant difference between the groups in turn of drawing mother as sarcastic animals and the use of lovable animals (P> 0. 05).
Conclusion: Differences in the visual graphic characteristics between these two groups would reflect the presence of psychological problems in unaccompanied children. Attention to children’s visual graphic could be considered as a base for assessing their psychological state.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
nursing
Received: 2014/08/26 | Accepted: 2014/11/24 | Published: 2014/11/24
Received: 2014/08/26 | Accepted: 2014/11/24 | Published: 2014/11/24
References
1. Veltman MW, Browne KD. Trained raters' evaluation of Kinetic Family Drawings of physically abused children. The Arts in psychotherapy. 2003;30(1):3-12. [DOI:10.1016/S0197-4556(02)00230-7]
2. Corman L. Child's painting (application of draw a family in clinic). 5th ed. Tehran: Rushed. 2008; 9-59.
3. Groth‐Marnat G, Roberts L. Human figure drawings and house tree person drawings as indicators of self‐esteem: A quantitative approach. J Clin Psychology. 1998;54(2):219-22.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199802)54:2<219::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-M [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199802)54:23.0.CO;2-M]
4. Hashemi N, Fadavi S. [Analysis of children's drawings]. Journal of Analytical Reserchical Negareh. 2009;12:106-17.
5. Ghasemi, M., [Mystery, children's drawings]. Journal of Information. 2006 :23755.
6. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences. 10th ed clinical psychiatry: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
7. Simsek Z, Erol N, Öztop D, Münir K. Prevalence and predictors of emotional and behavioral problems reported by teachers among institutionally reared children and adolescents in Turkish orphanages compared with community controls. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2007;29(7):883-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.01.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Guttman J. Posenberg M. Emotional intimacy and children's adjustment. A comparison between single- parents divorced and intact families. Educational Psychology. 2013; 23(4): 457-72. [DOI:10.1080/01443410303213]
9. Skybo T, Ryan-Wenger N, Su Y-h. Human figure drawings as a measure of children's emotional status: critical review for practice. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007;22(1):15-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.pedn.2006.05.006] [PMID]
10. Jafar Tabatabai T, Jafar Tabatabai S. [Uproar of children's drawings]. Quarterly News Psychotherapy. 2004;9(31-32):18-32.
11. Attaran A. [Psychological value of children's drawing]. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences (Peivand). 2006; 318: 20-4.
12. Aslipour A., Kafi M., Javed khosro M. [comparing graphic characteristics of children in orphanages and Ghyrprvrshgahy family drawing test]. Journal of Mental Health, 2010, 12 (4), 83-674.
13. Watkins CE, Campbell VL, Nieberding R, Hallmark R. Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1995;26(1):54-60. [DOI:10.1037/0735-7028.26.1.54]
14. Lev–Wiesel R, Samson T. Long-term effects of maternal death through paternal homicide evidenced from family of origin drawings. The Arts in psychotherapy. 2001;28(4):239-44. [DOI:10.1016/S0197-4556(01)00114-9]
15. Shakerian A. [Family drawings for psychological analysis of children living in normal and single-parent families]. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2010;11(4):312-21.
16. Silver R. Silver Drawing test supplement. Strasota, Florida: Ablin Press Distributors. 2000.
17. Mousavi R, Mousavi SS, Mahmodi gharai J, Akbari Zardkhaneh S. [Assessment and Diagnosis instruments Anxiety disorders among child and adolescents]. Journal of Military Medical Sciences. 2008;6(2): 147- 154.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
