Volume 37, Issue 147 (May 2024)                   IJN 2024, 37(147): 50-63 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sarcami Z, Naviporh H, Amadi F. Effect of Continuous Care Model-based Intervention on the Care Burden of the Caregivers of Patients With Spinal Cord Injury. IJN 2024; 37 (147) :50-63
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3689-en.html
1- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. , naviporh@modares.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 6613 kb]   (126 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (739 Views)
Full-Text:   (66 Views)
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes psychological problems for the patient and family, in addition to physical complications. Due to long-term and sometimes permanent complications of this injury, patients often depend on caregivers for performing daily tasks, depending on the level of injury. The family caregivers of patients with SCI suffer from physical, psychological, social, and economic problems, which is called “care burden”. Continuous support for these caregivers can reduce their care burden on them. 
The continuous care model (CCM) for chronic coronary artery diseases developed by Ahmadi (2010) has four stages: familiarization, sensitization, control, and evaluation. It is an indigenous model designed to increase self-care ability, acceptance of the treatment process, and appropriate performance of patients with chronic diseases. This model focuses on the effective, interactive, and balanced role of the caregiver, patient, and family. In this model, the role of the nurse or caregiver is to identify the existing needs and problems, sensitize people to these problems, and try to solve them so that they have healthy behaviors and continuous care in a dynamic manner. This study aims to investigate the impact of the CCM on the care burden of the family caregivers of patients with SCI. 

Method 
This is a quasi-experimental study. The study population consists of the family caregivers of patients with SCI covered by the welfare organization in Kamyaran City in 2021. Of these, 96 samples were selected using a convenience sampling method. The inclusion criteria were duration of caregiving >6 months, age <70 years, and willingness to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were lack of cooperation, death of the patient or caregiver, or change of caregiver during the study. After obtaining written informed consent from the participants, they were randomly divided into two groups of intervention (n=46) and control (n=46). During the study, two samples in the intervention group left the study. Therefore, the total number of participants was 94. The intervention group received CCM-based care, while the control received no intervention. They received the routine patient care program presented by the welfare organization.
They first completed the Zarit care burden interview (ZBI) instrument. Then, the intervention was provided at four stages of familiarization, sensitization, control, and evaluation, as a home-visiting program with the participation of the nurse, caregiver, patient, and family members for three months. In the familiarization phase (lasted three weeks), the patient, caregiver, and nurse first got to know each other, followed by evaluating the knowledge of the patient and caregiver about the disease, examining the knowledge of the caregiver regarding the care burden and its complications, recognizing and examining the facilities and limitations, measuring the patient’s expectations from the nurse/caregiver or vice versa, and needs assessment based on the evidence and statements of the caregivers. In the sensitization phase (lasted six weeks), the caregiver, patient, and the family members were involved in the implementation of the CCM. The caregivers attended skill training classes such as tailoring, aerobic exercise, and a weekly walking program. They also received medical, psychiatric, psychological, and nursing services and self-care education. The control stage aimed at continuing health behaviors to meet the needs of caregivers and reduce their problems. In each home visit, face-to-face meeting, and virtual communication, the caregivers or patients were asked about what they learned in the previous phase. The evaluation phase was done during a home visit. Each caregiver was evaluated theoretically and practically. 
Two weeks after the intervention, two groups completed the ZBI again. Independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Pearson or Spearman correlation tests were used to analyze the research hypotheses in SPSS software, version 16.

Results
Based on the results of chi-square, independent t, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test, the two groups were similar in terms of demographic variables (P>0.05). The independent t-test results showed no significant difference in the ZBI score at baseline between the control (51.91±7.95) and intervention (53.89±10.37) groups (P>0.05). However, after the intervention, the score in the intervention group (40.62±11.76) significantly decreased compared to the control group (51.33±9.01) (P<0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference between the pretest and posttest ZBI scores in the intervention group (P<0.001), but the difference was not significant in the control group.

Conclusion
The findings of the present study showed that the CCM-based intervention reduced the care burden of the family caregivers of patients with SCI. The CCM is an effective and useful model for reducing the burden of care for these caregivers due to its supportive and continuous nature. This intervention should be used in Iran; the health center managers should focus more on continuous communication with the SCI patients and their caregivers. The CCM can be used for the caregivers of patients with other chronic diseases.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the ethical committee of Tarbiat Modares University (Code: IR.MODARES.REC.1400.073). All ethical principles were considered in this study. The participants were informed about the study objectives and methods and were assured of the confidentiality of their information. They were free to leave the study at any time, and if desired, the research results would be available to them. 

Funding
This study was extracted from the master’s thesis of Ziba Sarchami at the Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. 

Authors' contributions
Investigation: Ziba Sarchami and Hassan Navipour; Project administration, data analysis, editing & review: Ziba Sarchami; Conceptualization: All authors.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank and appreciate the officials of the welfare department in Kamyaran city and all the caregivers who participated in this research for their cooperation.

References
  1. Song HY, Nam KA. Coping strategies, physical function, and social adjustment in people with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Nurs. 2010; 35(1):8-15. [DOI:10.1002/j.2048-7940.2010.tb00025.x]
  2. Ghavami H, Ahmadi F, Entezami H, Memarian R. [Effectivness of applying continuous care model on quality of life level in diabetic patients (Persian)]. Stud Med Sci. 2005; 16(1):22-7. [Link]
  3. Jeyathevan G, Catharine Craven B, Cameron JI, Jaglal SB. Facilitators and barriers to supporting individuals with spinal cord injury in the community: Experiences of family caregivers and care recipients. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42(13):1844-54. [DOI:10.1080/09638288.2018.1541102]
  4. Rupp R. Spinal cord lesions. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020; 168:51-65. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-63934-9.00006-8]
  5. Derakhshanrad N, Yekaninejad M, Vosoughi F, Sadeghi Fazel F, Saberi H. Epidemiological study of traumatic spinal cord injuries: Experience from a specialized spine center in Iran. Spinal Cord. 2016; 54(10):901-7. [DOI:10.1038/sc.2016.10]
  6. Kennedy P, Duff J, Evans M, Beedie A. Coping effectiveness training reduces depression and anxiety following traumatic spinal cord injuries. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003; 42(1):41-52. [DOI:10.1348/014466503762842002]
  7. Bumin G, Günal A, Tükel Ş. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in mothers of disabled children. Med J Süleyman Demirel Univ. 2008; 15(1):6-11. [Link]
  8. Dalirirad H, Ghezeljeh T. [The effects of educational support on anxiety in family caregivers of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (Persian)]. Nurs Midwifery J. 2019; 16(10):738-48. [Link]
  9. Nikbakht A, Bastami A, Norouzi Tabrizi K, Pashaei Sabet F, Gomarverdi S. [Exploring home-based rehabilitation in traumatic spinal cord injury patients: A qualitative study (Persian)]. Iran J Nurs Res. 2017; 11(6):32-41. [DOI:10.21859/ijnr-11065]
  10. Caro CC, Costa JD, Da Cruz DMC. Burden and quality of life of family caregivers of stroke patients. Occup Ther Health Care. 2018; 32(2):154-71. [DOI:10.1080/07380577.2018.1449046]
  11. Swartz K, Collins LG. Caregiver care. Am Fam Physician. 2019; 99(11):699-706. [Link]
  12. Caputo J, Pavalko EK, Hardy MA. The long-term effects of caregiving on women’s health and mortality. J Marriage Fam. 2016; 78(5):1382-98. [DOI:10.1111/jomf.12332]
  13. Coumoundouros C, Von Essen L, Sanderman R, Woodford J. Implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases: A protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(6):e035406. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035406]
  14. Ma HP, Lu HJ, Xiong XY, Yao JY, Yang Z. The investigation of care burden and coping style in caregivers of spinal cord injury patients. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014; 1(2):185-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.05.010]
  15. Simpson G, Jones K. How important is resilience among family members supporting relatives with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury? Clin Rehabil. 2013; 27(4):367-77. [DOI:10.1177/0269215512457961]
  16. Arno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM. The economic value of informal caregiving: President clinton’s proposal to provide relief to family caregivers opens a long-overdue discussion of this “invisible” health care sector. Health Aff. 1999; 18(2):182-8. [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.18.2.182]
  17. Selwood A, Johnston K, Katona C, Lyketsos C, Livingston G. Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia. J Affect Disord. 2007; 101(1-3):75-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.025]
  18. Torabi M, Hemmati Maslak Pak M, Radfar M, Alinejad V. [The impact of care- center group discussion on hemodialysis patients’ caregiver burnout (Persian)]. Nurs Midwifery J. 2017; 15(3):187-98. [Link]
  19. Hakimi A, Valavi E, Madhushimazrae S, Latifi M, Dashtbozorge B. The effect of continuous care model on parents’ knowledge and controlling symptoms and recurrence in children with nephrotic syndrome. J Multidiscip Care. 2016; 5(2):29-39.  [Link]
  20. Heydari M, Etemadifar s, Masoudi R, Kheiri S, Jivad N. [The effect of family-centered care on the family caregivers’ burden of patients with epilepsy (Persian)]. J Clin Nurs Midwifery. 2018; 7(2):146-57. [Link]
  21. Seng BK, Luo N, Ng WY, Lim J, Chionh HL, Goh J, et al. Validity and reliability of the Zarit Burden Interview in assessing caregiving burden. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010; 39:758-63. [DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V39N10p758]
  22. Conti A, Clari M, Nolan M, Wallace E, Tommasini M, Mozzone S, et al. The relationship between psychological and physical secondary conditions and family caregiver burden in spinal cord injury: A correlational study. Top Spin Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019; 25(4):271-80. [DOI:10.1310/SCI2504-271]
  23. Moosavinasab SM, Vahedian-Azimi A, Salesi M, Vahedi E, Zarchi A, Khoshfetrat M, et al. [A review of 17 years of application of a continuous care model on the consequences of acute and chronic diseases: Describing and assessing the quality of methodology of papers (Persian)]. J Mil Med. 2018; 20(1):27-55. [Link]
  24. NasrAbadi T, Sharafi S, Fallah Tafti B, Vaezi A, Heidari M. [Investigating the effect of continuous care model on social health status of family caregivers in hospitalized patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (Persian)]. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2016; 24(6):513-23. [Link]
  25. Moieni M, Poorpooneh Z, Pahlavanzadeh S. Investigating the effect of family-focused nursing intervention on caregiver burden of the family members of the patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery in Isfahan Shahid Chamran Hospital during 2012. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014; 19(2):187. [Link]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing
Received: 2023/05/6 | Accepted: 2024/04/20 | Published: 2024/05/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iran Journal of Nursing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb