Volume 27, Issue 92 (ّFebruary 2015)
IJN 2015, 27(92): 1-12 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aryani E, Narimani A, Kamangar K, Omidvar A. The Role of Gender in Research Self-efficacy of Nursing Students. IJN 2015; 27 (92) :1-12
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1971-en.html
URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1971-en.html
1- Master of Educational Research, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. (Corresponding author). Tel: +98 09198241704 Email: e.aryani.sh@gmail.com
2- Master of Educational Curriculum, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, University of kordestan, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Master of Educational Research, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
4- Master of Educational Management, Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2- Master of Educational Curriculum, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, University of kordestan, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Master of Educational Research, Faculty of Education Sciences & Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
4- Master of Educational Management, Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract: (6689 Views)
Abstract
Background & Aim: Research in the field of health is essential for the development of health care and plays a central role in medical sciences. Accordingly this study was undertaken to determine research self-efficacy of female and male nursing students in higher education.
Material & Methods: It was a descriptive, cross sectional study. The research population was nursing students of higher education in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences in academic year of 2013-2014. Simple random sampling was used to recruit the students. Data was collected by Phillips & Russell Research Self Efficacy (RSE) questionnaire and analyzed by Independent- sample t -test and Two- way ANOVA using SPSS-PC (v.20).
Results: The results showed that the male and female students were situated upper than the standard average in terms of self-efficacy of writing skills, practical research skills, quantitative and computer skills, research design skills and total research self- efficacy. There was no significant difference between male and female students in terms of self-efficacy of design skills, self-efficacy of practical research skills, self-efficacy of quantitative and computer skills, self-efficacy of writing skills, and total research self-efficacy ( p >0.05). No significant relationship was found between the interaction of gender and interest in research, and research self-efficacy (F =1/21, P=0/27). However, the singular role of interest in research and research self-efficacy was significant (F =7/63, P=0/006).
Conclusions: Future research is recommended to be undertaken to study the relationship between research self-efficacy and factors such as educational environment, scientific motivation and research products.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
nursing
Received: 2014/11/12 | Accepted: 2015/02/11 | Published: 2015/02/11
Received: 2014/11/12 | Accepted: 2015/02/11 | Published: 2015/02/11
References
1. Afshari M, Mohammadzadeh Ghasr A. [Study Challenges of Researching Culture in Iran. Management of Research and Technology Conference]. Tehran, Research Institute of Science Policy, Technology and Industry. 2012; 226-35.
2. Ali Beigi A H. [Analyses of Research productivity in faculty members (Case Study: Razi University)]. Research and Planning in Higher Education 2008; 46: 145-55.
3. TeimoriAsfichi A. [Research & Survey in Iran]. IJ Social Sciences (Fasleh Neo). 2010; 5 (16): 16-8.
4. Benz CR, Newman I. Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum: SIU Press; 2008.205-7. [PMID] [PMCID]
5. O'Keeffe F, Ganesan V, King J, Murphy T. Quality-of-life and psychosocial outcome following childhood arterial ischaemic stroke. Brain injury. 2012;26(9):1072-83. [DOI:10.3109/02699052.2012.661117] [PMID]
6. Burton H, Walters L. Access to Medicare-funded annual comprehensive health assessments for rural people with intellectual disability. Rural Remote Health. 2013;13:2278. [PMID]
7. Cheetham A. Growing a research culture. University of Western Sydney, Address. 2007. P:1-7.
8. Unrau YA, Beck AR. Increasing research self-efficacy among students in professional academic programs. Innovative Higher Education. 2004;28(3):187-204. [DOI:10.1023/B:IHIE.0000015107.51904.95]
9. Bieschke KJ. Factor structure of the research outcome expectations scale. J Career Assess. 2000;8(3):303-13. [DOI:10.1177/106907270000800307]
10. Bard CC, Bieschke KJ, Herbert JT, Eberz AB. Predicting research interest among rehabilitation counseling students and faculty. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2000;44(1):48-55. [DOI:10.1177/003435520004400107]
11. Hemmings B, Kay R. Research self-efficacy, publication output, and early career development. Int J Educ Manag. 2010;24(7):562-74. [DOI:10.1108/09513541011079978]
12. O'Brien KM, Heppner MJ, Flores LY, Bikos LH. The Career Counseling Self-Efficiency Scale: Instrument development and training applications. J Couns Psychol. 1997;44(1):20-31. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.20]
13. Mullikin EA, Bakken LL, Betz NE. Assessing research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: the clinical research appraisal inventory. J Career Assess. 2007;15(3):367-87. [DOI:10.1177/1069072707301232]
14. Forester M, Kahn JH, Hesson-McInnis MS. Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. J Career Assess. 2004;12(1):3-16. [DOI:10.1177/1069072703257719]
15. Karashki H, Bahman Abadi S. [Assessment components and factor structure of research self-efficacy in graduate student]. J Research and Planning in Higher Education 2013; 2 (consecutive 68): 91-114.
16. Lev EL, Kolassa J, Bakken LL. Faculty mentors' and students' perceptions of students' research self-efficacy. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(2):169-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.007] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Kahn JH. Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: A refinement and extension. J Couns Psychol. 2001;48(3):344-54. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.344]
18. Bieschke KJ. Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. J Career Assess. 2006;14(1):77-91. [DOI:10.1177/1069072705281366]
19. Ramin MR, Aghazadeh M. [Research self-efficacy in the psychology and educational sciences graduate students]. Research in Curriculum Planning. 2014;10(9):147-55.
20. Shirbegi N. [Survey of student's attitude in research and its relationship with self-efficacy belief in research]. Training and Learning Researches, Shahed University. 2011;18(1):67-80.
21. Baltes B, Hoffman-Kipp P, Lynn L, Weltzer-Ward L. Students' research self-efficacy during online doctoral research courses. CIER. 2010;3(3):51-8. [DOI:10.19030/cier.v3i3.187]
22. Faely S, Pezeshkirad GR, Chizari M. [The Survey Of Effective Factors On Students'contribution In Research Activities And Scientific Production]. J Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2007;12 (4):93-106.
23. Burgoyne LN, O'Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Medical education online. 2010;15.: 26-29. [DOI:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Khan H, Khawaja MR, Waheed A, Rauf MA, Fatmi Z. Knowledge and attitudes about health research amongst a group of Pakistani medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6(1):54. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-6-54] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Siemens DR, Punnen S, Wong J, Kanji N. A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school. BMC Med Education. 2010;10(1):1-4. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-10-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Amin TT, Kaliyadan F, Al Qattan EA, Al Majed MH, Al Khanjaf HS, Mirza M. Knowledge, attitudes and barriers related to participation of medical students in research in three Arab Universities. Educ Med J. 2012;4:(1)7. [DOI:10.5959/eimj.v4i1.7]
27. Changizi ashtyani S, Shamsi M. [Comparison of barriers to research activities form the point of view of normal and talented students at Arak University of Medical Sciences]. Educational Research in Medical Sciences Journal. 2012;1(1):26-31.
28. Carrion M, Woods P, Norman I. Barriers to research utilisation among forensic mental health nurses. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41(6):613-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.01.006] [PMID]
29. Anbari Z, Jadidi RA. [Comparing of Barriers to Research Activities among Students of Arak University of Medical Sciences, and Appropriate Strategies for Student Research Management]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2013;13(5):435-48
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
